Tertiary Source

What's the antimatter content of a banana?

2008-10-21 11:06:37

Antimatter is strange, exotic stuff, right? Only produced in dangerous physics experiments? Leads to complete annihilation with ordinary matter?

Sort of. It's a question of quantity.

Consider the element potassium. Potassium, like sodium, is an alkali metal; potassium ions in solution play an important role in several different biochemical processes. You have to eat potassium or you'll die, but this is true for lots of different plants and animals, so potassium deficiencies aren't common in well-fed people. Natural potassium is made of three different isotopes. About 117 parts per million natural potassium is potassium-40, 40K, which is unstable with a lifetime 1.25 billion years. This radioactive potassium is left over from the formation of the solar system; in the 4.5 billion years since the earth coalesced, 97% of the the original 40K has decayed.

A "medium" banana (whatever that means) has about half a gram of potassium, or 7.7×1021 atoms. Of these, 9.0×1017 (about sixy micrograms) are 40K. If you picked just one of these nuclei, you'd have to wait a billion years (on average) to see it decay; in our banana we have lots of atoms we can watch all at once, so there will be about 23 decays per second. Of these decays, 89% are β- decays to calcium, and 11% are electron capture decays to argon. Only one decay in 105 actually emits an antielectron. So an ordinary banana contains an antielectron for a brief instant about once every 75 minutes.

Of course, all the β- and electron capture decays are accompanied by an electron antineutrino, which leaves the banana at the speed of light. Which is a bigger contribution to the antimatter number density in a banana: an antielectron that stops and annihilates, or an antineutrino that instantly escapes?

Comment on What's the antimatter content of a banana?
(I promise not to do anything unsavory with your contact information.)
You can also send regular email.

Recent questions


Older questions

To an outside observer, an object dropped onto a black hole never actually crosses the horizon; it approaches the horizon asymptotically and light from it becomes more and more redshifted. Suppose I drop a room-temperature blackbody in a hole. How long does it take before the redshifted temperature is colder than the Hawking temperature of the horizon?
2009-02-27 Friday 23:24:26
With continuous thrust, it takes less energy to eject an object from the solar system than to crash it into the sun. This isn't the case for satellites in low-earth orbit, since they skim the atmosphere already. For geosynchronous satellites? Where is the boundary?
2009-02-13 Friday 08:41:34
A stopped clock is exactly right twice a day. With some error-weighted averages, a stopped clock is more accurate on average than a clock running, say, ten minutes fast. What averages do and don't have this property?
2008-11-19 Wednesday 23:40:45
If you pull two connected blobs of Silly Putty apart slowly, the thread between then stretches plastically; if you pull them apart quickly, it fractures cleanly. What sets the threshold? How sharp is it?
2008-10-20 Monday 16:16:27
Suppose two stationary states in a nucleus differ only by their (total) isospin. What's physically different between them?
2008-10-07 Tuesday 09:53:07
What other neat tricks could you pull off using volunteer hardware as a distributed sensor network?
2008-09-30 Tuesday 18:39:26
What's the pressure inside an unopened soda bottle (or can)? What's the rate at which CO2 comes out of solution at ambient pressure? How much does the bubbling change the temperature of the liquid?
2008-09-23 Tuesday 19:19:09
I have heard it repeated a few times now that, in some counting, the human body is "mostly" bacteria. Is this number of cells? biomass? genetic information? Wikipedia cites a 2005 "mini-review" in Anaerobe. How much of the human body and its function are bacterial in other interesting metrics?
2008-09-22 Monday 10:40:07
Will the LHC make polarized proton beams?
2008-09-21 Sunday 14:36:02
Parity nonconservation in weak interactions can interfere with strong or electromagnetic interactions to produce parity-forbidden transitions or correlations. Without some unusual enhancement, the approximate statement "strong and electromagnetic interactions do not have pseudoscalar observables" is accurate to 10-7. What similar statement can one make about CPT conservation?
2008-09-21 Sunday 14:21:05