Tertiary Source

What's the antimatter content of a banana?

2008-10-21 11:06:37

Antimatter is strange, exotic stuff, right? Only produced in dangerous physics experiments? Leads to complete annihilation with ordinary matter?

Sort of. It's a question of quantity.

Consider the element potassium. Potassium, like sodium, is an alkali metal; potassium ions in solution play an important role in several different biochemical processes. You have to eat potassium or you'll die, but this is true for lots of different plants and animals, so potassium deficiencies aren't common in well-fed people. Natural potassium is made of three different isotopes. About 117 parts per million natural potassium is potassium-40, 40K, which is unstable with a lifetime 1.25 billion years. This radioactive potassium is left over from the formation of the solar system; in the 4.5 billion years since the earth coalesced, 97% of the the original 40K has decayed.

A "medium" banana (whatever that means) has about half a gram of potassium, or 7.7×1021 atoms. Of these, 9.0×1017 (about sixy micrograms) are 40K. If you picked just one of these nuclei, you'd have to wait a billion years (on average) to see it decay; in our banana we have lots of atoms we can watch all at once, so there will be about 23 decays per second. Of these decays, 89% are β- decays to calcium, and 11% are electron capture decays to argon. Only one decay in 105 actually emits an antielectron. So an ordinary banana contains an antielectron for a brief instant about once every 75 minutes.

Of course, all the β- and electron capture decays are accompanied by an electron antineutrino, which leaves the banana at the speed of light. Which is a bigger contribution to the antimatter number density in a banana: an antielectron that stops and annihilates, or an antineutrino that instantly escapes?

Comment on What's the antimatter content of a banana?
(I promise not to do anything unsavory with your contact information.)
You can also send regular email.

Recent questions


Older questions

With continuous thrust, it takes less energy to eject an object from the solar system than to crash it into the sun. This isn't the case for satellites in low-earth orbit, since they skim the atmosphere already. For geosynchronous satellites? Where is the boundary?
2009-02-13 Friday 08:41:34
Much of the work of digestion is done by bacteria in the gut. Could an appropriately engineered infection permit someone to extract nutrition from normally indigestible materials, like grass and wood?
2009-01-29 Thursday 19:37:59
Children's medicines come suspended in goopy liquids. Some part of the medicine always stays behind in the measuring spoon. Do dose estimates like "3/4 teaspoon twice daily" include a correction for the left-behind part of each dose? Do different types of dosing cups make a difference? Or do other factors introduce more uncertainty?
2008-12-29 Monday 19:14:27
Yesterday's solstice was the day when the northern hemisphere gets less solar irradiance than any other. In most countries this is "midwinter," but in the United States it's "the first day of winter." When did this label change?
2008-12-22 Monday 06:58:50
CSX has been advertising that they "move a ton of freight 400 miles on a gallon of fuel," or suchlike. This seems extreme, like a cherry-picked statistic. Where does it come from? (more)
2008-11-20 Thursday 10:11:10
What's a typical pattern of presidential pardons? How has this changed under recent administrations?
2008-10-13 Monday 17:46:13
Suppose two stationary states in a nucleus differ only by their (total) isospin. What's physically different between them?
2008-10-07 Tuesday 09:53:07
There are 146×106 Powerball lottery tickets. If the jackpot goes above about $120M, the average payoff on a single ticket is more than a dollar. Of course, buying two tickets doesn't double the payoff: you can't win the jackpot twice. If an ensemble of catious statisticians only played the lottery when the payout was positive, what fraction would actually come out ahead?
2008-09-24 Wednesday 09:39:54
Will the LHC make polarized proton beams?
2008-09-21 Sunday 14:36:02
Parity nonconservation in weak interactions can interfere with strong or electromagnetic interactions to produce parity-forbidden transitions or correlations. Without some unusual enhancement, the approximate statement "strong and electromagnetic interactions do not have pseudoscalar observables" is accurate to 10-7. What similar statement can one make about CPT conservation?
2008-09-21 Sunday 14:21:05